CASES
June 1, 2002
Personal Injury
Mirvahedy v Henley
Acting for the claimant in the leading case on the construction of s.2 (2) Animals Act 1971.
CASES
June 1, 2002
Real Estate
Freund v Charles Scott Development Ltd [2002] EQCA Civ 106
Nature of notice necessary to transfer the benefit of a conditional contract for the sale of development land.
CASES
January 1, 2002
Disputed Wills, Wills & Trusts
Mawby v Howard [2002] All ER D 114
Leslie successfully acted for the claimant in a challenge to a will by allegation of forgery and want of knowledge and approval.
CASES
August 2, 2001
Professional Negligence
X v Woollacombe Yonge [2001] WTLR 308
John was lead by Christopher Sharp QC in acting for the claimant seeking damages for professional negligence against the firm of the solicitor who had attended the deceased who was terminally ill in hospital, to take
CASES
June 2, 2001
Commercial
Bristol & West plc v Bartlett [2001] All ER (D) 404
John acted for a building society in defeating assertions that a mortgage shortfall debt was statute barred.
CASES
June 1, 2001
Real Estate
Caradon District Council v Bussell [2000] 3 EGLR 57
The Times 17th May 2000 CA restrictive covenant.
CASES
June 1, 2001
Real Estate
Minster Chalets v Irwin Park Residents Association [2001] EWLands LRX 28 2000
Residential landlord and tenant.
CASES
June 1, 2001
Real Estate
Goodman v Evely [2004] EWCA Civ 104, [2002] HLR 53
Residential landlord and tenant.
CASES
June 1, 2001
Personal Injury
Nixon v F J Morris
The potential link between trauma and the onset of Multiple Sclerosis.
CASES
June 1, 2001
Family & Divorce
Re B (care proceedings, disclosure, Article 8) [2001] 2 FLR 1017
Disclosure – care proceedings relating to four children. Father of one of the children seeking disclosure of all documents filed in court proceedings. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
CASES
June 1, 2001
Administrative Law, Planning
R (Gloucestershire CC) v SSETR [2001] 82 P. & C.R. 171
Status of footpath destroyed by riverbank erosion; whether the footpath could move with the bank; whether the public were entitled to pass into a new line of footpath because of the destruction.