The claimant was a tanker driver employed by the second defendants delivering concentrated bleach for the first defendants.  Whilst discharging he was sprayed with the product from a fault in the line sustaining chemical burns and

In Price v Egbert H Taylor & Company Limited the Claimant had wrongly said that a pre-1/4/13 CFA was in existence (in fact there was none). Having lost the claim he said that because there was

James was successful in acting for a local authority in a multi-track personal injury claim brought by an employee. The decision provides employers with clear authority and guidance over the interpretation and meaning of Regulation 4(3)

James successfully set aside a late notice of discontinuance and had the claim struck out with an enforceable costs order under CPR44.15.

Two day trial concerning the nature of duty of care owed to a school pupil during the conduct of a science experiment at school. James successfully acted for the Claimant at first instance.

A claim was discontinued at trial because it disclosed no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim and a wasted costs order was obtained against the Claimant’s solicitors in respect of their conduct of the claim.

Ben Handy was instructed by Horwich Farrelly solicitors in order to defend this claim on behalf of the defendant insurer, Esure.

No fee means no application. Matthew acted for the defendant employer and the claim was struck out on the basis that an application to extend time for service of the claim form, whilst received by the

Point of interest: for highway lawyers: Shine v Tower Hamlets [2006] EWCA Civ 852 (no s.41 duty in respect of street furniture) applies to pillar fire hydrants just as much as it does to bollards. The

In which His Honour Judge Denyer QC held, on appeal, that applications for pre-action disclosure are interim applications for the purposes of the fixed costs regime.

Richard is defending a claim by a widow following the death of her husband who was kicked by a bullock: sections 2(2), 5(1) and (2) of the Animals Act 1971.

Andrew successfully represented the defendant in the Court of Appeal in the work-related stress case of Coventry University v Mian [2014] EWCA Civ 1275. Andrew was instructed by Matthew Harrington of BLM solicitors Cardiff on behalf