Natasha Dzameh successfully represented an administrator in joined trials in the High Court. The first concerned a claim by the administrator for an injunction, an account and other relief in relation to a property he alleged

Alex acted for the third defendant who challenged the validity of her late mother’s will and, in the alternative, pursued a proprietary estoppel claim against the mother’s house.

Nick Pointon acted in a successful application for the construction and rectification of two standard form trusts of life assurance policies.

Oliver appeared for the Claimant in a Beddoe application. HHJ Paul Matthews reviewed authorities dealing with the principles in making Beddoe orders where the underlying claim was in substance between beneficiaries who could make their own

Scope of the trustee’s entitlement to indemnity costs in action by beneficiary against trustee.

Determination of admissible evidence and pleadings on the assertion of unlawful killing in forfeiture proceedings where that assertion had not been the subject of a criminal trial.

His Honour Judge Paul Matthews, sitting as a judge of the High Court, handed down judgment on 8 March 2018 in the Chancery Division of the Bristol District Registry. The court ruled on an issue that

Natasha Dzameh represented the Defendants at a complex 3-day trial concerning breach of trust, duress, proprietary estoppel, resulting trusts, unconscionability, undue influence and unjust enrichment. The scope of the Claimant’s case was reduced to one of

Christopher Jones advised and represented the successful claimants in their application for orders in the construction and rectification of a lifetime settlement. Conflicting provisions within the trust instrument provided that where a gift of the fund failed it

Adam represented the claimants in this proprietary estoppel/constructive trust case decided by HHJ Matthews sitting in the High Court in Bristol. The case received media attention as a result of the finding that a relatively informal

Joss acted for the successful defendant in the High Court in the much-publicised case of Culliford v Thorpe [2018] EWHC 426 (Ch). This case provides a useful example of the principles relating to common intention constructive trusts and

Leslie Blohm QC has recently been instructed in the latest farming case to consider a claim by a farmer’s child to the family farm. The claimant, now sixty years old, sought to succeed to the farm he was