In this case report, Head of Clinical Negligence, Justin Valentine, counsel for the claimant, discusses a recent cauda equina syndrome case where an allegation of deliberate concealment by the claimant’s surgeon was made thereby engaging section

Kayleigh Bloomfield of our Real Estate team was instructed by Thomas Lewis of WBW Solicitors to act for the successful claimants in a claim for possession and a declaration of title by virtue of adverse possession to an

Joss Knight of our Wills & Trusts team was instructed by Wolferstans LLP to act for the successful claimant in Oliver v Oliver [2024] EWHC 2289 (Ch) before HHJ Matthews in which the last will of the claimant’s late father was declared invalid.

Peter Wadsley acted for Bristol City Council in a judicial review (‘JR’) challenge by ETM to an outline planning permission granted by Bristol to Esteban on 22nd August 2023, for a development at a site known

Natasha Dzameh represented the successful Claimant in Lloyd v Hayward & Another [2024] EWHC 2033 (Ch), defending against an application to strike out the Claimant’s claim for abuse of process on the basis of allegations of

Charlie Newington-Bridges acted for the successful respondent in a contract appeal heard by Mr Justice Zacaroli J in the High Court in the case of Rarity Holdings Limited and David Parkhill [2024] EWHC 1637 (Ch).

Head of Chancery, Christopher Jones was instructed by Tony Pearce of Richard Nelson LLP to represent the claimant, Duncan McNiven, in his claim to establish a beneficial interest in a residential property in Tewkesbury.

Sophie Smith-Holland was instructed by Sophie Webb of RWK Goodman to represent the mother in an application by a Local Authority for a Deprivation of Liberty Order (“DoLs order”) in respect of a child, J, heard

Ben represented the Claimant, a pedestrian in his 60s struck by a car while walking along a country lane, in a £5m+ catastrophic injury claim.

One of the leading cases on the meaning of detriment in a proprietary estoppel claim. The Court of Appeal confirmed that any non-financial disadvantage had to be weighed against financial benefit, even where the non-financial disadvantage

James Adams represented the child, whose parents had each been found to have perpetrated serious domestic abuse against the other, at a six-day final hearing. Recorder ordered that the child have no direct contact with his

The Supreme Court has handed down judgment in the case of Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council [2024] UKSC 15. They have overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal that the defendant was responsible for