Application to modify restrictive covenants so as to permit the construction of a new community rowing facility on the bank of the River Dee in Chester.

Whether a lifetime gift of property by mother to one of her sons should be set aside on the ground of undue influence.

In this case Adam acted for the defendants in a property dispute arising from the breakdown of a housing project commenced by two couples. Various companies were set up for the purpose of purchasing and developing

Leslie Blohm QC who was instructed by Stephens Scown LLP, represented Lucy Habberfield in her claim in the Chancery Division in Bristol against her mother for a share of her mother and father’s farm, relying on

Acting for purchasers of house afflicted with damp in claim against damp specialists for negligent survey.

St John’s Chambers Members, Alex Troup and Abigail Bond, were involved in the case of Re DMM, a Court of Protection case which was recently reported on Bailii and has been the subject of considerable press interest. The case concerned an

Lucy Reed acted for the child in a case in which difficulties with the quality of expert evidence led to the adjournment of a final hearing, and where the District Judge’s judgment regarding that expert evidence

Charlie Newington-Bridges was instructed by Gregg Latchams Solicitors to act for the claimant in a trial which was reported in news media as a landmark case, and involved demonstrations outside court. The claim was between a national

Charlie was instructed by Neil Morgan, partner at Darwin Gray Solicitors, to represent the successful Respondent, Monnow Developments Limited. The Appellant, Mr Morgan, borrowed £250,000 from the Respondent, Monnow Developments, a property development company. The loan

Ben acted for the Defendant in this six-figure Multi-Track employers’ liability claim involving serious allegations of fraud including fabrication of witness statements by the Defendant, and surveillance evidence which was inconsistent with the Claimant’s written evidence.

The claimant was at the defendants’ public house with her partner. Without provocation her partner was punched by a man at the pub. In the ensuing scuffle the claimant and her partner were ejected from the