Andrew Mclaughlin has successfully defended one of the largest FD cases to be tried in the past 12 months.

One-week inquest into the death of a 13-year old girl who had a history of a worsening cough and weight loss. She was deemed not acutely unwell and was to be seen the following week. She

Ben successfully represented a child claimant who was seriously injured on a school trip in France when the coach he was travelling on flipped on a motorway.

Natasha Dzameh successfully represented an administrator in joined trials in the High Court. The first concerned a claim by the administrator for an injunction, an account and other relief in relation to a property he alleged

In this 5 day finding of fact hearing, Asha represented the mother who was in the pool of perpetrators in relation to significant bruising to an immobile baby.

Asha represented the father assisted by his intermediary in this final hearing in care proceedings. She submitted that in the interests of fairness and the need to consider parenting with adequate support, the father’s needs and

Asha acted for the local authority in this 4 day final hearing involving significant neglect over a number of years. The local authority was undergoing a serious case review in relation to this case following criticism

Asha acted for the children led by Susan Hunter in this 18 day fact finding hearing in the High Court. The case involved a number of allegations relating to physical and sexual abuse of children and

Asha represented the local authority in this 5 day final hearing in care proceedings concerning allegations of inflicted injury. She secured significant findings of physical and emotional abuse against both parents.

John acted for the successful claimant, a very elderly lady with major health problems, in a claim to recover two houses and large cash deposits allegedly gifted to defendants, who were related to her by her son’s

Dominik represented the respondent in a case where the applicant had applied for a Non-Molestation Order. Dominik was able to finalise these proceedings at the return date hearing as a result of the respondent accepting the

Alex acted for the third defendant who challenged the validity of her late mother’s will and, in the alternative, pursued a proprietary estoppel claim against the mother’s house.