Alex Troup, instructed by Hugh James, represented the successful claimants in the case of Dunbabin & Ors v Dunbabin [2022] EWHC 241 (Ch), a case concerning the law of severance. The main issue in the case was whether

Tim Leader appeared for Dartmoor National Park Authority  in the Court of Appeal, having represented the Authority in the High Court during 2021.  The High Court decision case report can be found here.

Leslie Blohm QC (leading Tom Gosling of 23 ES Chambers) has been instructed by Glaisyers in the high-profile case of Leeson v Mcpherson where he appeared for the claimants, Leesons family.

A decision of HHJ Russen (sitting as a High Court Judge) regarding strike out applications in connection with a dispute over the beneficial ownership of a yacht.

Three members of our Personal Injury team were all successful in the Court of Appeal in a judgment handed down on 17th January 2022 in the case of Brown v South West Lakes Trust and others [2022] EWCA Civ 18,

The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882. Lucy Reed acted for the applicant journalist who wished to report the contents of a fact finding judgment delivered in the course

Dominik Morton represented the respondent father at a ten-day fact-finding hearing. The issues revolved around neglect of the children due to them being severely obese for their respective ages. Dominik was also heavily involved with case

Personal Injury barrister, James Marwick was recently successful in securing a finding of fundamental dishonesty on appeal in the reported case of Cornish v Darnley.

Two-week jury inquest into the death of a man who suffered from Asperger’s Syndrome and Paranoid Schizophrenia who was detained under the MHA. He died in a fire which he started whilst he was on unescorted

Dominik Morton represented the applicant mother at a contested final hearing. Dominik was able to successfully able to resist an application made by the respondent father for a change of residency and successfully persuaded the Court

Dominik Morton represented the respondent mother at an IRH in the High Court. After lengthy discussions, the parties came to an agreement whereby there would be a gradual progression towards reunification between the respondent mother and

Natasha Dzameh successfully represented a claimant who had applied for removal of a lay executor and a professional executor, the estate not having been administered for circa 6 years. The application was opposed by the lay